Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and pkg-config support
From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-01 20:43:43

Next message: Kazutoshi Satoda: "Re: [boost] [1.46.1] branches/release open for bug fixes only"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[boost] [Review] Phoenix V3: Mini-review ends March 2nd"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Boost and pkg-config support"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Boost and pkg-config support"

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:45:05AM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:

> Actually, I think that pkg-config is relevant only for compiled libraries.
> For others, it's just -I whatever business.

Is that guaranteed?

Suppose a header-only Boost.X makes calls to a compiled Boost.Y
library. Now my client code (using Boost.X only) has to know to link
using -lboost_y.

I don't believe this scenario is forbidden.

-Steve

application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature

Next message: Kazutoshi Satoda: "Re: [boost] [1.46.1] branches/release open for bug fixes only"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[boost] [Review] Phoenix V3: Mini-review ends March 2nd"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Boost and pkg-config support"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] Boost and pkg-config support"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk