|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-06 06:01:24
On Mar 6, 2011, at 5:22 AM, Ivan Sorokin wrote:
>
> After your reply I changes my mind. As I see you had considered all my suggestions long before I posted them. If they really lead to unavoidable performance penalty I think current implementation is a good trade-off.
>
> I vote for inclusion XInt into boost.
Seems like Chad's reply was off-list?
Could the rest of us see what convinced Ivan?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk