Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review (concrete complaint)

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review (concrete complaint)
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-07 09:19:11

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:04:27 +0900
Ryo IGARASHI <rigarash_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I would like to comment only on the issue with Expression Template
> (ET). [...]
>
>> I haven't looked at Boost.Proto yet, but I did look at a couple hits
>> from Google on the subject in the last couple days. Maybe I'm missing
>> it, but I didn't see anything that would allow that.
>
> As Xint is an numerical library and you are the author of it,
> you may be familiar with ET usage in Boost.uBLAS than Boost.Proto
> (the latter is very generic). [...]

Thanks. I haven't yet had a need to use Boost.uBLAS, so I'm no more
familiar with it than Boost.Proto, but I'll certainly check both out.
-- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*