Re: [boost] [config][clang] Does <boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp> need updating?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config][clang] Does <boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp> need updating?
From: Doug Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-09 12:23:42

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Regarding Beman's original question about
>>> <boost/config/compiler/clang.hpp>, I'll be happy to keep it up-to-date
>>> with feature checks for Clang, since I'm also the maintainer of the
>>> feature checks on the Clang side. I'm not a good candidate for
>>> platform champion, though, because I don't watch Boost closely enough
>>> to be helpful.
>>
>> I've updated the Clang configuration in Boost.Config in Boost trunk
>> (r68659) to reflect Clang's C++0x support.
>
> Great!
>
>> Please tell me if I'm
>> supposed to merge this to trunk, or whether someone will do so.
>
> Merge to release:-? Yes, please do as soon as clang trunk tests have cycled.

Hi Beman. I completely fumbled this... is it still possible for me to
merge these changes?

  - Doug