Re: [boost] Fwd: Re: [move] You can do it better: implementing push_back and handling implicit conversions

Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: Re: [move] You can do it better: implementing push_back and handling implicit conversions
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-10 03:14:12

El 10/03/2011 9:05, Ion Gaztañaga escribió:

> I was thinking in something like:
>
> #define BOOST_MOVE_CONVERSION_AWARE_INSERTION_CATCH(TYPE, FWD_FUNCTION,
> RETURN_VALUE)

Sorry, it's also missing the name of the public function, of course ;-)

Ion