Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts

Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 12:42:51

Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>
> The possibility of default ctor customization is no remedy, because
> ICL should ideally be completely "chrono agnostic" and still
> interoperable. For the same reason duration::zero() is not an option.

Why can't ICL have a customization point for the identity value that defaults to T()?  Then chrono can customize that (assuming there is a suitable value to use).

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.