Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts

Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 16:34:41

Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
> 
> 2011/3/15 Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
> 
>> Hoping the proposals are close to the interoperability point. If the
>> separated traits don't satisfy your design, maybe you could define a
>> specific traits that groups all your needed traits.
> 
> Thank you for your proposals. This is going in a good direction. And I
> personally think that the simpler solution, needing less indirections
> and less customization code may also be considered.
> 

I'm open to any evolution on Boost.Chrono that has a consensus, so I want to
hear what others think ;-)

In any case all the added functions should be accessible only if
BOOST_CHRONO_EXTENSIONS is defined, so semantic compatibility with
std::chrono is maintained. 

Best,
Vicente

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/chrono-Interoperability-with-ICL-and-common-concepts-tp3357088p3357683.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.