Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts

Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-16 12:01:48

2011/3/16 Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>>
>> (2) An increment/decrement on the least steppable unit
>> (3) A difference_type declaration
>>
>> Very simple, very little effort, great benefit for instant
>> interoperability, not only with ICL but with all generic libraries
>> that depend on this minimal set of fundamental information.
>>
>>
>
> Joachim,
>
> could you create a ticket for (3). I don't think this is too disruptive.

Yep!