Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection...

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection...
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-16 15:45:25

On 16/03/2011 19:39, John Maddock wrote:
>>> * Remove the concept related macros.
>>> * Tighten up most of the C++0x related tests, with the result that some
>>> C++0x features that were previously enabled are no longer - this may
>>> also cause the Boost.Config tests to fail on some platforms.
>>> * Some C++0x features that were not previously enabled are now - because
>>> they were passing the Boost.Config tests - there's at least one case
>>> where this is causing regressions in other libraries - if any more pop
>>> up please let me know ASAP!
>>
>> Any reason why decltype on MSVC10 is still not enabled?
>
> If someone tells me that this issue:
> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/04/164645.php is fixed then
> fine, otherwise it appears to be a lot trouble,

I wasn't aware of this issue.
But doesn't it only affect result_of, with decltype still usable in 
practice for other things?