Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Big changes in C++0x detection...
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-17 20:35:55


[Eric Niebler]
> Yes. So the behavior of vc10's decltype wrt this issue is in conformance with /current/
> working paper -- which is broken, according to n3233. It will be discussed soon in Madrid.
> If the proposed wording is accepted (and I hope to god it is), then VC10's decltype --along
> with everybody else's-- will need to be fixed.
> But please fix it anyway. :-)

I'll ask the compiler team for a fix. I don't always get what I want, but the STL is the compiler's first and best customer, and I've been looking forward to making result_of 95% powered by decltype.

(Keeping track of rvalue references v2, lambdas v1.1, rvalue references v2.1, rvalue references v3 - I actually don't know if that one was reverted in the Working Paper - and now decltype v1.1 can be exhausting!)

STL


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk