Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-19 07:47:15

Frédéric Bron wrote:
> 
> I am not sure of the formatting of the table you received because I
> received
>    it in text mode, not html, so let me retry (sorry for this).
>    > Could you make the same analysis with "const, volatile and
> references"
>    I must answer in html. cv qualifiers work just fine.
>    In the implementation, I have removed the reference qualifier from the
>    analysis when I added the +=, -=, ... operators because they require
> lvalue
>    as left hand side parameter (so I first remove the & if it exists and
> then I
>    add it to make sure I have an lvalue).
>    This makes  and  behave the same. I am checking if I can handle
>    this better.
> 
>      operator+(A) operator+(const A) operator+(volatile A) operator+(const
>    volatile  A)  operator+(A&) operator+(const A&) operator+(volatile A&)
>    operator+(const volatile A&)
>    has_operator_unary_plus  true true true true true true true true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false true false true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false false true
>    true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false false
>    false true
>    has_operator_unary_plus<A&> true true true true true true
> true true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false true false true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false false true
>    true
>    has_operator_unary_plus true true true true false false
>    false true
> 
> 

Thanks,

this will make cleared the documentation. What about the return type?

Best,
Vicente 

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Review-Boost-Type-Traits-Extension-by-Frederic-Bron-tp3380479p3389492.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.