|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Enums: naming question?
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-21 03:42:16
Max Sobolev wrote:
>
> On 19.03.2011 23:12, Vicente Botet wrote:
> >
> > Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.-2 wrote:
> >>
> >> Then all I can suggest as a better name is *maybe* scoped_type or
> >> scoped_enum_type. But scoping_type might be fine.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, scoping_type and scoped_enum_type seems reasonable, but I prefer
> yet
> > the use of native_type. What do others think?
>
> I like scoped_enum_type name :)
>
>
Sorry, I think I misunderstood Jeffrey.
were you proposing to replace scoping_type by scoped_enum_type or or
scoped_type and let native_type as now?
Thanks,
Vicente
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Enums-naming-question-tp3388473p3392828.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk