Re: [boost] [inspect] exceptions (FW: [Boost-users] no exceptions)

Subject: Re: [boost] [inspect] exceptions (FW: [Boost-users] no exceptions)
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-23 22:49:18

AMDG

On 03/23/2011 07:32 PM, Vicente BOTET wrote:
>> OK, but you're speaking about the motivation for development of BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION. I'm speaking about the motivation to make
>> using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION a guideline. Supporting non-conforming compilers is definitely not in the focus of Boost guidelines
>> ("There is no requirement that a library run on C++ compilers which do not conform to the ISO standard.")
> Note that people working on embedded systems could be using a conforming compiler but they could decide to disable exceptions as the performances could be improved, let me say by 15%. 15% that they absolutely need.

The fact that non-conformance is intentional does
not make it conforming.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe