Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-24 08:11:31

Next message: Tal Agmon: "[boost] [move] [ thread] ambiguous call to overloaded function"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"
Next in thread: Mathieu -: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"

On 24/03/2011 13:07, Mathias Gaunard wrote:

> On MSVC, SSE built-ins are always available but may result in a runtime
> error. There are only the /arch:SSE and /arch:AVX option used to tell
> the compiler that it can generate SSE or AVX instructions automatically,
> there are no /arch:SSEx options.

Errata: there is a /arch:SSE and a /arch:SSE2, but no /arch:SSE3,
/arch:SSSE3, /arch:SSE4a, /arch:SSE4.1, /arch:SSE4.2

Next message: Tal Agmon: "[boost] [move] [ thread] ambiguous call to overloaded function"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"
In reply to: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"
Next in thread: Mathieu -: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] SIMD proposal"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk