Re: [boost] [Review] Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron - Review summary and decision

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron - Review summary and decision
From: Frédéric Bron (frederic.bron_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-27 10:45:30

>  - The main recurring suggestions found was the choice of name for the
> operator traits with respect to the standard naming, naming in proto and
> other boost libraries.
>  * Frederic and a few other seems to favor the proto naming scheme (more or
> less the negate issue and the pre/post operator)
>  * the question of a common prefix is still open

What about is_callable_plus, is_callable_plus_assign, ...
i.e. is_callable_xxxx where xxxx the same as in Boost.Proto?

I know that is_xxxx_callable reads better but I like to have a common
prefix longer than is_.

Frédéric