Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-27 18:15:02

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Thomas Heller
<thom.heller_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On Sunday, March 27, 2011 05:38:23 PM Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>
[...]

> > I don't think think that Boost.Lambda and Boost.Phoenix use the usual
> > C++ syntax to program the "function" body.
>
> Usual is just a point of view.
>

I don't think it's an unfair point of view; and, at the very least, the
first row of the table in [1] is a fair distinction to make between the
libraries.  Can you suggest an alternative for the first row header of the
table?

- Jeff

[1]
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/local/libs/local/doc/html/boost_local/Alternatives.html