Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-28 12:41:21
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard-2 wrote:
> On 03/26/2011 03:19 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I am updating Boost.Local docs and I could use a some help in getting
> > the Alternatives section right
> You might include compile time and run time benchmarks, information
> about error message quality, and polymorphic capabilities.
> Additionally, you might note that with C++0x local classes can be used
> with templates.
Good suggestions. I will include all of those.
How would the polymorphic (type) row read? (I don't fully understand
this...) For example:
Boost.Local: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal
Local Classes: No.
C++0X Lambdas: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal
Is this correct?
Thank you very much.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Help-for-the-Alternatives-section-tp3408469p3412341.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk