Re: [boost] [gsoc] Interest in BGL v2?

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Interest in BGL v2?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-31 10:02:43

At Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:53:02 -0500,
Andrew Sutton wrote:
> 
> I will say that our design does take a slightly more object-oriented
> approach (g.size(), for example), but that hardly precludes
> adaptation. Adaptors would have to be written as classes, but that
> shouldn't be a big deal.

I think you underestimate the cost of adaptation-via-wrapper and urge
you to stick with free functions unless you have a really good reason
to do otherwise.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com