Subject: Re: [boost] [local] this_ or _this?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-04 01:13:23
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Joshua Juran <jjuran_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]>
>>> Hello all,
>>> Boost.Local uses a special name `this_` to access the object `this`
>>> bound from the enclosing scope. Shall this name be `this_` or `_this`
>>> according to Boost practices?
>> Names with leading underscore should be avoided, they may be used by
>> the compiler for its own needs.
> A name beginning with an underscore not followed by a capital letter is
> allowable at non-global scope (provided it doesn't contain two consecutive
> underscores). Such names include _, _1, and _this.
Granted, it is very unlikely _this to be used by the implementation,
but I've seen compilers defining macros with leading underscore
followed by a lowercase letter. There is no reason to insist on using
leading underscores, in global scope or not.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk