Subject: Re: [boost] [shifted_ptr] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 18:35:21
On 4/6/2011 1:53 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 4/6/2011 1:22 PM, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
>> If the parent is still able to do something (like incrementing a times
>> in the child widget), then obviously references to the parent still
>> exist. For Mark& Sweep, you are in a context where even every implicit
>> reference is known to the garbage collector. It's clear that you can't
>> strictly guarantee this for a C/C++ program. But in this case, the
>> problem would be that an implicit reference went unnoticed by the
>> Mark& Sweep garbage collector, not that it wiped an unreferenced node.
> The timer was a bad example, forget about it. But in the case of the
> Mark & Sweep algorithm, a call to the parent window destructor will
> still be premature if the modal child dialog box still exists.
I think I made a mistake because Shifted Pointer will act like the Mark
& Sweep and delete the unreferenced parent node. Sorry about the
confusion, I'll make the modification to the presentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk