Re: [boost] [locale] Review part 1: headers

Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review part 1: headers
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-10 05:16:20

> From: Gevorg Voskanyan <v_gevorg_at_[hidden]>
> Artyom wrote:
> > Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> > >  Definitely a  no-no.
> > > Dereferencing an invalid iterator  is  a programming error,  not an 
> > > exceptional  situation.
> > > 
> > > The thing to use   is an  assertion.
> > I'm sorry but as far as I remember nobody   deprecated
> > std::logic_error (and std::out_of_range derived from   it).
> > 
> > Small point, when you program some mission critical  systems
> > and  services you don't want the process to go down  for
> > something that maybe only  a single response can go
> >  down that way. This is very important for  some
> > mission critical  code (and I had written such
> > code not  once).
> 
> 
> For that  reason one can specify a different behavior for BOOST_ASSERT to 
>invoke 
>
> when  it fails - throw std::logic_error, log somewhere, whatever.
> [snip]

Didn't know this, if so this is very good.

If so I'll fix it this way BOOST_ASSERT.

Artyom