Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Pool] TR1?
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-12 12:53:10
On 4/12/2011 8:04 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> I think you are severely missing the point: it is not implementable, no
> matter the cost in complexity, without causing undefined behavior. You're
> just not allowed to compare arbitrary pointers with<, and the total
> ordering produce by std::less isn't guaranteed to be meaningful.
Thanks for the clarifications but if the stack and data segments were
part of a pool then 'false' returned by is_from() would then be a valid
according to the definition of is_from().
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk