Re: [boost] Fw: [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library

Subject: Re: [boost] Fw: [locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library
From: Sergey Cheban (s.cheban_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-15 05:05:45

15.04.2011 1:49, Fabio Fracassi пишет:
> On 14/4/2011 23:25, Artyom wrote:
>
>> 3. When you use MSVC add UTF-8 BOM (even thou it is
>> useless but this is the way MSVC distinguishes
>> between local encodings and UTF-8)
>>
>> Bad but this is reality.
>
> IIRC clang will not compile source files with a BOM, which would
> effectifly render the code unportable.
Any code that uses the characters that are not in the "basic source 
character set" (96 characters) is not portable anyway. The 
EBCDIC-encoded sources probably cannot be compiled by the clang, too.

--
Sergey Cheban