Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review: Build
From: Gevorg Voskanyan (v_gevorg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-17 03:33:27

Artyom wrote:
> However I wouldn't be so sure that ICU would accept
> and maintain BBv2 build scripts.

Honestly I didn't even plan to submit that to ICU.

> With all my respect to BBv2 and I have one,
> I doubt if 3rd part project would accept it
> even if the the Boost community
> there are doubts about BBv2 and plans to
> move to CMake (ryppl)

Your scepticism is understandable. For me, if a 3rd party lib wants to accept
BBv2 scripts, fine, but if it doesn't, then that's fine as well. The only
concern I have here is that if I have ICU itself building with BB, I want
Boost.Locale to use that instead of trying to find ICU binaries installed on the
system. That is all my original point was about.

> My $0.02

Thank you for sharing your perspective,

> Artyom


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at