Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Off-list review of Boost.Locale library
From: Fabio Fracassi (f.fracassi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-17 05:55:01
On 16/4/2011 21:40, Artyom wrote:
>> Translate GETTEXT might be better in a separate library to increase
>> degrees of freedom and reduce coupling.
> message translation is generally integrated part of localization, so I don't
> see a reason to separate it.
Full Ack! I'd be extremly unhappy with a locale library that did not
contain this part.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk