Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-19 15:24:22
On 19/04/2011 17:27, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 08:13 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> On 18/04/2011 14:24, Artyom wrote:
>>>> some compile-time values tested at runtime,
>>>> some things that could have reused existing
>>>> utilities from Boost,
>>> More specific points?
>> I saw stuff like
> And what exactly is wrong with this?
> Most compilers are perfectly capable of
> optimizing away the branch, and it makes
> the code more straightforward than any
> compile time selection mechanism.
True, it's a style thing, but the fact that there were several issues
with this single line caught my eye.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk