Subject: Re: [boost] [Shifted Pointer] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-22 03:14:51
On 4/22/2011 12:03 AM, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> I think he is just suggesting to replace
> "new shifted<T>(...)"
> or something similar, where make_shifted returns a shifted_ptr<T>
> directly rather than a raw pointer to shifted<T>.
make_shifted<>() would make overloading of the allocator less flexible.
This is why I opted for operator new.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk