Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?
From: kopo (kopinskc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-23 19:07:43

Next message: John Bytheway: "Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Convert library, new subversion URL"
Previous message: Takaya Saito (SubaruG): "[boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required"
In reply to: Ross MacGregor: "[boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"
Next in thread: Ross MacGregor: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"
Reply: Ross MacGregor: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"

Was this ever resolved? Are there any plans on resolving this in future
versions?

I am having the exact same issue.
Are there any non-invasive solutions? Even if it means a possible lose of
data?

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/interprocess-message-queue-hangs-when-another-process-dies-tp2648488p3470801.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: John Bytheway: "Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Convert library, new subversion URL"
Previous message: Takaya Saito (SubaruG): "[boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required"
In reply to: Ross MacGregor: "[boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"
Next in thread: Ross MacGregor: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"
Reply: Ross MacGregor: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] More robust message_queue and interprocess_condition?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk