Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required
From: Takaya Saito (SubaruG) (gintensubaru_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-25 04:32:09
2011/4/25 Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]>:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Takaya Saito (SubaruG)
> <gintensubaru_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I think the macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT ( or BOOST_NO_0X_NOEXCEPT ) is
>> required soon.
>> How's the status now?
> The semantics of throw() and noexcept are not identical. Also, the
> semantics of throw() are not identical on all platforms.
Yes, that's right. And I don't need a macro expanding to throw() or
noexcept(true) so soon.
But, I think a macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT, which describes the presence of
noexcept keyword, is required ASAP.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk