Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] Time zone improvements
From: Luke Camden (lukeocamden_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-26 07:45:19

Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Artyom wrote:
>> It is completely broken.
> It is certainly deficient. We have wrapped it here with a mechanism that
> locates rules based upon the year, but we merely smoothed over the
> multiple-changes-per-year problem by picking the dominant values for a
> given year. It's a hack, but good enough for our purposes.
> _____
> Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
> Dev Tools & Components
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP

Hi Rob,

Whose purposes is it good enough for? Does this mean you think there is no
reason to 'correct' the API?


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at