Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] Time zone improvements
From: Luke Camden (lukeocamden_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-26 07:45:19
Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Artyom wrote:
>> It is completely broken.
> It is certainly deficient. We have wrapped it here with a mechanism that
> locates rules based upon the year, but we merely smoothed over the
> multiple-changes-per-year problem by picking the dominant values for a
> given year. It's a hack, but good enough for our purposes.
> Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
> Dev Tools & Components
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
Whose purposes is it good enough for? Does this mean you think there is no
reason to 'correct' the API?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/date-time-Time-zone-improvements-tp2652795p3475243.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk