Re: [boost] [Memory Managed Pointer] Review Request

Subject: Re: [boost] [Memory Managed Pointer] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-26 18:00:57

On 4/26/2011 12:57 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestions everybody but I'm now considering:
> mutual_ptr, which tells what it's made for. The "set" qualifier should
> be hidden from the user because it'll make the code cleaner.

mutual_ptr or:
common_ptr
public_ptr
joint_ptr
allot_ptr

I personally prefer the latter so if there's no objection then I'll go 
for it.

-Phil