Re: [boost] [Config] A proposal to Boost.Config.

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] A proposal to Boost.Config.
From: Kohei Takahashi (flast_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-27 05:02:55

> I don't see how that could ever be portable - there's no guarantee that 
> every platform has such a header?
> 
> BTW we normally only add Boost.Config macros for Boost's internal use, is 
> this such a case?  If so some more information on the problem you want to 
> solve might help...
> 
> Cheers, John. 
I want such macro when I use Escape Sequence, ioctl, etc...
This also applies to Boost, for example Boost.Thread switches header
itself.

Boost.Config switches header at each platform, nevertheless does not
provide that way.
I think that's too bad.

However, if it is determined to be unsuitable to provide at
Boost.Config, I agree.

Thanks.

-- 
TAKAHASHI Kohei
College of Information Science, University of Tsukuba
private mail: flast_at_[hidden]
others:       flast_at_[hidden]
              s0911476_at_[hidden]