Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] A proposal to Boost.Config.
From: Kohei Takahashi (flast_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-27 05:02:55
> I don't see how that could ever be portable - there's no guarantee that
> every platform has such a header?
> BTW we normally only add Boost.Config macros for Boost's internal use, is
> this such a case? If so some more information on the problem you want to
> solve might help...
> Cheers, John.
I want such macro when I use Escape Sequence, ioctl, etc...
This also applies to Boost, for example Boost.Thread switches header
Boost.Config switches header at each platform, nevertheless does not
provide that way.
I think that's too bad.
However, if it is determined to be unsuitable to provide at
Boost.Config, I agree.
-- TAKAHASHI Kohei College of Information Science, University of Tsukuba private mail: flast_at_[hidden] others: flast_at_[hidden] s0911476_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk