Subject: Re: [boost] [locale] Review results for Boost.Locale library
From: Marsh Ray (marsh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-27 18:05:54
On 04/27/2011 02:23 PM, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 11:46 AM, Marsh Ray wrote:
> > [comments about ASCII requirement]
> A suggestion was made at one point that an ASCII transliteration of
> Japanese would be a possible solution, and I think most of us can agreed
> that should be rejected immediately as a non-viable solution.
> However, forcing MSVC users to use one of the Windows "ANSI" encodings,
> such as windows-936, wouldn't be nearly such an impediment.
I've worked at places where I couldn't use certain Boost libraries
because I couldn't change the necessary compiler setting to work around
a well-documented bug in MSVC). At this place they also questioned
whitespace changes which were not even affecting visible formatting.
Thankfully I don't work there any more.
I don't know how much of a change it is for a software developer in
Japan to convince his team to change their source file encoding so they
can use some library. It's probably non-trivial.
What I do know, however, is that the set of users who are candidates for
ending up as happy users of a library is always much greater when the
library developers don't think they can "force" users to adopt specific
compiler settings or agree to other nonstandard constraints.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk