Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 10:26:50

Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote:
> 
> On 03/04/2011 21:44, Vicente BOTET wrote:
> 
>> I guess that this benchmark shows a hard limitation of Boost.Local at
>> least until most of the compilers will accept local structures as
>> template parameters.
> 
> Don't all of them do it already, at least in C++0x mode?
> 

I think so (that's the case at least in my experience). Here is the accepted
C++0x proposal that allows to pass local (and unnamed) types as template
parameters:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2657.htm

--Lorenzo

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Help-for-the-Alternatives-section-tp3408469p3490119.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.