Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 10:26:50

Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 21:44, Vicente BOTET wrote:
>> I guess that this benchmark shows a hard limitation of Boost.Local at
>> least until most of the compilers will accept local structures as
>> template parameters.
> Don't all of them do it already, at least in C++0x mode?

I think so (that's the case at least in my experience). Here is the accepted
C++0x proposal that allows to pass local (and unnamed) types as template


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at