Subject: Re: [boost] [review] string convert
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 13:12:41
Gordon Woodhull wrote:
> Therefore I vote to accept this library with the strong
> condition that a simpler syntax be adopted, doing away with the
> odd static ::from() function, and completely getting rid of the
> confusing, error-prone lazy functions. I am aware that the
> author thinks the present syntax is necessary, but I will argue
> against it in each case.
No one would argue against a simpler interface that does all of what Boost.Convert does. Would you take the time to suggest a complete design? That would be fairest to Vladimir who spent a long time trying to devise a useful interface that encompassed the several usage styles wanted and likely won't easily be able to look past the current design to something else now. Besides, it would provide a concrete idea others can see and discuss.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk