Subject: Re: [boost] [Block Pointer] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-02 15:32:42
On 5/2/2011 10:09 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Order of instantiation is irrelevant outside of RAII management
> patterns, since an object may outlive its creator (that's the point).
If block A was instantiated first then block A is necessarily the parent
of block B.
> What do you mean by the block_ptr will be invalidated? The pointer will
> be set to zero?
> So that's something any user should be ready for, check block pointers
> are non-zero in destructors?
It's already done implicitly in the destruction of the block_ptrs.
Right before they'll be destroyed the pointer will still refer to the
deallocated memory block.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk