Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result
From: Marsh Ray (marsh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-03 12:02:51
On 05/02/2011 03:04 PM, Barend Gehrels wrote (in another order):
> There was somebody who recently mentioned a scoreboard on this list
> and I now think this is a good idea, because the review manager can
> check if all reviews are taken into account.
It would also make it more practical for an observer like me to sit down
and simply read the reviews in an orderly way.
> I understand that the traffic was really high, that review managers
> do this voluntary, everybody don't have all the time, etc.
> Reviews are usually carefully written. People spend several hours on
> it, sometimes days. Skipping these reviews is a sad thing. Writing a
> library cost weeks, sometimes months or more. Forgetting reviews is
> a very sad thing.
Honestly, I would be more likely to help review libraries if I felt like
it wouldn't be buried in the volume of the list.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk