Subject: Re: [boost] [Block Pointer] Review Request
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-03 15:28:59
On 5/3/2011 7:47 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 5/3/2011 2:43 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> or if(p) rather sorry.
> I imagine this is more convenient, yes. I'll make the change in a bit.
The problem is this only happens in the destructor and operator bool is
usually called many times outside of the destructor. If I check for
cyclicism inside operator bool then this would create unnecessary
overhead for the calls outside of the destructor.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk