Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Library Review Tool (paging Jeff Garland) -- was : Re: [xint] Formal Review Result
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-04 08:28:11

> > Some time ago we all had a discussion like this and I believe Jeff
> > Garland had mentioned Smart Bear's CodeCollaborator to aid in Boost
> > Reviews. I used their product for a short time and was just taking a
> > look at their web site again:
> >
> > <
> > >
> >
> > I know there are other tools also (like Crucible) but CodeCollaborator
> > also allows reviews of html docs which will obviously be handy. IIRC
> > Jeff had mentioned that SmartBear might be willing to provide
> > licensing for Boost (or opensource .. it is all fuzzy). I believe Jeff
> > was in contact with them... but my memory might be failing (Jeff?? Are
> > you there?)
> >
> > I would be willing to investigate this path further, including the
> > administration and such of the tool, if it is of interest to the
> > community.
> >
> >
> > michael
> >
> Some of us on IRC (Thomas Heller, Jeroen Habraken, and I) played with demo
> projects this past hour in both CodeCollaborator and Crucible. So far,
> Crucible seems the easiest to follow. The interface provides general
> threaded discussions also. The only thing that seems lacking at first
> glance is the ability to review HTML docs.
> Feel free to take a look and provide some feedback!
> The main Crucible site can be found here:

How permanent are those reviews? Will we be able to go back in a couple of
years and see what went on? Generally mailing lists have proven to be quite
resilient to websites going down, that's why I somehow prefer having all
discussions here...

Regards Hartmut

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at