Re: [boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required
From: Takaya Saito (SubaruG) (gintensubaru_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-04 16:48:00

2011/4/26 Takaya Saito (SubaruG) <gintensubaru_at_[hidden]>:
> 2011/4/25 Vicente BOTET <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Message du 25/04/11 10:35
>>> De : "Takaya Saito (SubaruG)"
>>> A : boost_at_[hidden]
>>> Copie à :
>>> Objet : Re: [boost] [config] Macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT is required
>>>
>>> 2011/4/25 Emil Dotchevski :
>>> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Takaya Saito (SubaruG)
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/214978
>>> >>
>>> >> I think the macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT ( or BOOST_NO_0X_NOEXCEPT ) is
>>> >> required soon.
>>> >> How's the status now?
>>> >
>>> > The semantics of throw() and noexcept are not identical. Also, the
>>> > semantics of throw() are not identical on all platforms.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's right. And I don't need a macro expanding to throw() or
>>> noexcept(true) so soon.
>>>
>>> But, I think a macro BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT, which describes the presence of
>>> noexcept keyword, is required ASAP.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I·m sure Johm will be happy to accept a patch with the tests and the docs if you follow the procedure described in the documentation for the addition of new macros.
>>
>
> I tried to write the patch, but I couldn't understand how to generate
> `no_noexcept_pass.cpp` and `no_noexcept_fail.cpp`

I've succeeded in generating and testing them, so here's the patch on
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk at revision 71717,
including changes at the previous patch.