|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [review] string convert
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-04 19:03:56
On May 4, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Scott McMurray wrote:
> The scary implicit conversions might even make some sense when there's
> no destination type:
> int i = convert(x);
Please read the posts (esp Thomas Heller's and Christopher Jefferson's) about how implicit conversions break template functions and auto. They're more than just scary.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk