Subject: Re: [boost] inquiry about proposing a new Boost library for a tree template container class
From: Erik Erlandson (eerlands_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-04 17:47:02
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:37 -0700, Cromwell Enage wrote:
> > I think that Boost.Tree is orphaned so maybe you
> > could see how to make a better libraries from both.
> It's orphaned!? Shoot, I'd like to help out with this too...maybe merge my TreeNode stuff if possible.
If you have any thoughts on integration, I would be interested -- I'm a
Boost user, but as a Boost developer I'm an utter n00b.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk