Subject: Re: [boost] std::map::find() wrapper
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-05 05:00:17
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Marsh Ray <marsh_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Thus, it is better to use optional<T or &> instead of pointers whenever it
> supplies the required operations.
When auto is available, the disadvantage of boost::optional is minimal.
It's clear that some people really prefer boost::optional, so find_opt
or find_optional could be provided as well.
To what Boost lib could this be added? Utility?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk