Subject: Re: [boost] [phoenix] not playing nice with other libs
From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-07 11:50:31
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Mathias Gaunard
> On 06/05/2011 22:06, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Eric Niebler<eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 5/5/2011 2:54 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>>> If you guys like, I could up the default BOOST_RESULT_OF_NUM_ARGS to,
>>>> say, 15. I don't anticipate that it would cause any problems.
>>> Hey, that'd be swell. Not sure why this solution didn't occur to me.
>>> Looks like for the purpose of Phoenix, you'd only need to bump it by 1
>>> to 11. I'm not sure why 11 instead of 10. Thomas?
>> OK, done. I bumped it up to 16 just for good measure, so there'll be
>> plenty of elbow room in the future.
> Did you check it didn't increase compile times significantly?
> boost::result_of is used in a lot of places.
I just ran a some tests and didn't notice any increase in compile time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk