Re: [boost] [trolling] Alexander's crusade

Subject: Re: [boost] [trolling] Alexander's crusade
From: David Bergman (David.Bergman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-07 14:11:48

Henrik, when you here (again) cut the initial segment, it is a bit hard to understand your comment.

There is no reason not to keep those other (20?) lines above the "So did your's [sic] ;-)" to assist the reader in understanding the quite intriguing comments and thoughts.

And I who thought that all Swedes always got along so well ;-)

/David

On May 7, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:

> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Lars Viklund <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 06:22:23PM +0200, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
>>> So did your's ;-)
>> 
>> Nope, mine has the proper References: and In-Reply-To: headers,
>> referring to Matt's message, just like your headers references mine.
>> 
>> Surely you don't expect me to manually rejoin a broken thread through a
>> reply? That if anything would throw clients into a confused state :)
> 
> No, but your subject change created a new thread for me in gmail (but
> this reply didn't)
> 
> /$
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost