Subject: Re: [boost] [convert] no-throw and fallback feature
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-09 16:54:29
Matthew Chambers wrote:
> On 5/9/2011 2:58 PM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> > Vicente BOTET wrote:
> >> De : "Stewart, Robert"
> >>> You don't think "convert" is a good choice?
> >> I would prefer to use a noun for namespace, then an adjetive
> >> and in the last instance a meaningless name, like spirit. I
> >> have never used a verb as namespace.
> > That's a good policy. My only argument in favor of "convert"
> > is that it works so well for things like convert::to (and
> > it's shorter!).
> If there will be short names like "to" or "as" in the namespace
> then namespace qualification in user code will practically be
I'd use to<int>(s) or as<int>(s) without qualification.
> On the other hand, 'convert' is both a noun and a verb. :P
:) Too bad they don't both have the same pronunciation!
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk