Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Review request
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-19 11:34:42

Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> On 5/17/11 5:40 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
>> Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I would be happy to volunteer to be the review manager if one is
>>> needed
>>> > to move the process along, but since I am new to the community and
>>> > personally biased in favor of the library (though I would endeavor to
>>> be
>>> > unbiased as a reviewer) I recognize you all will presumably want
>>> someone
>>> > that you all know better and who is more neutral. Regardless, I hope
>>> >
>> Greg once mentioned that he would be willing to be the Review Manager but
>> I
>> am not sure if that is still a valid offer:)
> My offer still stands, with the same caveats I mentioned before. :-)

Greg, on my part, I gladly accept your offer to be the Review Manager for
Boost.Local. Thank you!

1) The guidelines at
"Before a library can be scheduled for formal review, an active boost member
not connected with the library submission must volunteer to be the "Review
Manager" for the library."
2) The brief discussions at
3) The fact that no Booster raised concerns
I don't think that the caveats you mentioned should be of concern.

Ron (as the Review Wizard), would you consider Greg's offer to the
Boost.Local's Review Manager acceptable? If yes, is it possible to assign a
date to the Boost.Local review?


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at