Re: [boost] [local] Review request

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Review request
From: Gregory Crosswhite (gcross_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-19 18:10:53

Ron, I just wanted to say again as I have said before that it has 
occurred to me that you all might feel this way and so I completely 
understand and have no hard feelings at all about your decision.  :-)

Best regards,
Greg

On 5/19/11 12:56 PM, Ronald Garcia wrote:
> Hello Lorenzo,
>
> Given Gregory's recent entry  into the Boost community and process,  I am not comfortable having him as manager for you library review.  Nonetheless, thanks a lot Gregory for volunteering.  I expect that you will provide an informed and high-quality review for this library when the time comes.
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
> On May 19, 2011, at 11:34 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
>
>> Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
>>> On 5/17/11 5:40 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
>>>> Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
>>>>>> I would be happy to volunteer to be the review manager if one is
>>>>> needed
>>>>>> to move the process along, but since I am new to the community and
>>>>>> personally biased in favor of the library (though I would endeavor to
>>>>> be
>>>>>> unbiased as a reviewer) I recognize you all will presumably want
>>>>> someone
>>>>>> that you all know better and who is more neutral.  Regardless, I hope
>>>>>>
>>>> Greg once mentioned that he would be willing to be the Review Manager but
>>>> I
>>>> am not sure if that is still a valid offer:)
>>> My offer still stands, with the same caveats I mentioned before.  :-)
>>>
>> Greg, on my part, I gladly accept your offer to be the Review Manager for
>> Boost.Local. Thank you!
>>
>> From:
>> 1) The guidelines at
>> http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Review_Manager
>> "Before a library can be scheduled for formal review, an active boost member
>> not connected with the library submission must volunteer to be the "Review
>> Manager" for the library."
>> 2) The brief discussions at
>> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/introductions-tt3529868.html
>> 3) The fact that no Booster raised concerns
>> I don't think that the caveats you mentioned should be of concern.
>>
>> http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Wizard
>>
>> Ron (as the Review Wizard), would you consider Greg's offer to the
>> Boost.Local's Review Manager acceptable? If yes, is it possible to assign a
>> date to the Boost.Local review?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Lorenzo
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Review-request-tp3522996p3536110.html
>> Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe&  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe&  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost