Subject: Re: [boost] RFC: type erasure
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-23 20:27:26
On 05/23/2011 02:57 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> How does it compare to Adobe.Poly?
I'm not very familiar with Adobe.Poly, but from
a quick glance, the biggest differences are
a) My library is based on composing independent
primitives. Poly seems to be designed for
a straight linear hierarchy.
b) I can capture constraints that affect multiple
types. There's an example of this in
print_sequence.cpp. I don't think Poly
could handle this at all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk