Subject: Re: [boost] [Block Pointer] benchmark
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-25 11:00:32
On 25 May 2011 02:18, Phil Bouchard <philippe_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 5/24/2011 10:52 PM, Nevin Liber wrote:
>> Heck, even auto_ptr is significantly faster using new instead of
>> and make_block. Simply amazing! Wait, ... how exactly did you use
>> make_shared and make_block in the auto_ptr case?
> auto_ptr uses make_auto in the make test, shared_ptr uses make_shared and
> block_ptr uses make_block.
And what exactly is make_auto doing that is *much more* costly than a heap
allocation? According to your numbers, it takes almost 2.5x longer than
just a new.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk